Uniting for Freedom, Democracy & Equality​

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
1988 Massacre
Activities
Activities Outside Iran
Annual Grand Gathering
Articles
Coronavirus
Death Commissions
Economic
Free Iran 2020 Global Summit
Free Iran 2021
Free Iran 2022
Free Iran 2023
Free Iran 2024
Free Iran 2024 World Summit
Free Iran World Summit
Free Iran World Summit 2021
Free Iran World Summit 2023
Grand Gathering 2016
Grand Gathering 2017
Grand Gathering 2018
Grand Gathering 2018- Videos
Grand Gathering 2019
Grand Gathering 2020
Human Rights
International Supports
Iran Protests
Iran Revolution
Iranian Assemblies
Iranian Resistance
Maryam Rajavi
Media Gallery
National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI)
News
Opinion
People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran(PMOI/MEK)
Quotes
Reports
Resistance Activities Inside Iran
Socio - Economic Crisis
The Free Iran World Summit 2019
Videos
Women

State Media Turns on Iran Presidential Candidates

The Iranian state-run media has been documenting a marked increase in factional infighting amongst the regime in the run-up to the presidential elections, as well as the unpopularity of the candidates, and the popular boycott campaign that is organized by the Resistance.

The Arman daily wrote Sunday, May 16: “While the system’s sympathizers repeatedly underline people’s very low motivation to participate in the election, the serious question is why [candidates] are busy with the façade and not paying attention to the core problems?”

After all, the low turnout problem, confirmed by “scientific and unbiased polls” is not helped by the hollow promises of the candidates. An example is a pledge by many candidates to quash corruption, even though the rot comes from the top down and by that, we mean that Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is the most corrupt of all, but officials are unable to meaningfully challenge him. After all, these prominent candidates could all resolved the issue already from their high-ranking positions if they have the inclination and ability.

The Arman daily wrote: “During the last 42 years that you held various executive and judicial positions; did you not see corruption? Didn’t you watch it become institutionalized? Did you not have the tools to deal with corruption? … Whoever assumes the country’s executive branch for the next four years has one result, and that is the inefficiency of the country’s management over the past 40 years.”

This is the simple acknowledgement that there is no way to resolve the economic crisis, nor any of Iran’s problems, under the regime. What is needed is regime change, which is why boycotting the election is essential. It undermines the regime’s narrative that they are popular amongst the people and will isolate the mullahs internationally, making regime overthrow easier.

Meanwhile, the Jahan-e Sanat daily wrote Sunday about the role that the presidential candidates have played in creating the social and economic crises they promise to fix.

Their article read: “The same individuals want to blame their rivals. Now Iranians say that these [candidates] each were senior executives in different institutions and organizations for the past four decades, and they misled Iran’s economy.”

Also on Sunday, the Ebtekar daily wrote that the country’s problems include:

  • Unequal distribution of subsidies amongst the people
  • Poor foreign policy
  • Regime’s lack of transparency
  • Inflation
  • Currency repression
  • Mistrust by the people
  • Belligerence
  • No positive economic outlook
  • Regional adventurism, including warmongering and terrorism
  • No independence of the central bank

Recent Posts

State Media Turns on Iran Presidential Candidates