In recent developments, political figures from the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Italy have voiced strong opposition to the Iranian regime’s smear campaign against the Iranian Resistance, particularly targeting Maryam Rajavi, the President-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI). These leaders also criticize the policy of appeasement adopted by some Western nations, which they argue emboldens Tehran’s hostile actions.
United States
A group of U.S. national security and foreign policy leaders has publicly rejected the slanderous attacks against Maryam Rajavi. They emphasize her commitment to democratic values and human rights, underscoring that the disinformation campaign aims to delegitimize the Iranian opposition’s efforts for a free Iran.
Canada
Canadian Member of Parliament Judy Sgro has condemned the appeasement of Tehran manifested through attacks on the Iranian Resistance. She asserts that such actions not only undermine the legitimate aspirations of the Iranian people but also compromise global efforts to hold the regime accountable for its malign activities.
United Kingdom
British lawmakers have expressed strong disapproval of the smear campaign against the Iranian Resistance and the appeasement of Tehran’s hostage diplomacy. They argue that yielding to the regime’s tactics endangers fundamental democratic principles and emboldens Tehran to continue its oppressive policies.
Additionally, MP Bob Blackman has specifically condemned the defamation of Iran’s democratic opposition, highlighting the necessity for the international community to stand firm against Tehran’s propaganda and support the Iranian people’s quest for freedom.
Italy
Italian legislators have denounced the smear campaign against Maryam Rajavi and criticized Tehran’s hostage diplomacy. They stress that the international community should not be swayed by the regime’s manipulative tactics and should instead support the NCRI’s efforts to establish democracy in Iran.
Collectively, these international leaders call for a reassessment of policies toward Iran, advocating for a firmer stance against the regime’s misinformation efforts and a more robust support for the Iranian Resistance’s democratic objectives.
