Amb. Lincoln Bloomfield, Jr., Former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs joined the Online Free Iran Global Summit—day 2. In his remarks, Amb. Bloomfield said, “I wrote a monograph explaining in detail the politics and the heritage of this movement called The Ayatollahs and the MEK: Iran’s Crumbling Influence Operation. “
In July 1988, the Iranian religious fascism’s founder and the first supreme leader Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa ordering the execution of imprisoned opponents, including those who had already been tried and were serving their prison terms. This was the beginning of what turned out to be the biggest massacre of political prisoners since World War II.
Following the decree, some 30,000 political prisoners were extra-judicially executed within several months. Today, thanks to the initiative of Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, president-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), known as “Call for Justice” many legal and international bodies have joined the families of victims in search of justice.
Here is the speech of Amb. Lincoln Bloomfield:
Thank you very much. Greetings to the members of the resistance and to Madame Rajavi. Congratulations on your amazing virtual rally on Friday. Thank you for including me in this event. I was asked nine years ago by a law firm to look at the MEK and study them and the NCRI.
I became very interested in the deeper story. I wanted to know the history of this group, the MEK. The more I looked, the more I found that the story of this group, the true story of the MEK, has been erased. It has been entirely misrepresented. The MEK, I learned, was advocating democracy, freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, and the practice of Islam that is consistent with modern life, not to a grotesque abuse of religious faith to support political tyranny. Ayatollah Khomeini wanted Masoud Rajavi’s support for his new constitution in 1979, and Mr. Rajavi refused to accept. Mr. Rajavi and President Banisadr led large democracy demonstrations in Iran in 1981.
Ayatollah Khomeini sent his forces, his guns, into the street to kill his own citizens, just as Bashar al-Assad did in 2011 in Syria, just as the Chinese Communist Party did during the Tiananmen Square protest. The MEK was not a radical Marxist group, as many people in Washington say. This is propaganda started by the Shah, referring to violent extremists who conducted terrorist acts in the 1970s and tried to steal the prestige and the identity of the PMOI.
The MEK, that I am addressing today, is not connected in any way to the extremists who killed Americans in Iran. In fact, it was Khomeini who brought in the Russian KGB advisors from the Soviet Union to help advise his new dictatorship on how to keep control against a population.
The MEK never fought in the Iran-Iraq war. There was a U.N. ceasefire in place at the time of the MEK’s operation Eternal Light in 1988. It is very striking to me that the regime repeats this falsehood to try to portray the MEK as traitors to their own country rather than as steadfast defenders of the Iranian people’s rights and their sovereignty. Let them explain why Saddam Hussein held on to MEK prisoners of war who had been captured at the start of the war defending Iran, why did he keep them until 1989? Similarly, allegations that the MEK was a cult were promoted by Iran’s ministry of intelligence as part of its demonization campaign. There were many more falsehoods amplified by the Western media and analysts.
So, in 2013, I wrote a brief 50-year summary of this untold story, with the help of the University of Baltimore and Professor Sheehan. And part of the story, as you know, is what was done to these brave people. Incredibly, here we are seven years after this book came out and Western media and thinktank reports still repeat the allegations that were debunked entirely and officially by court challenges in France, the European Union, the UK and the United States years ago. Why do they keep repeating these allegations, these falsehoods? My conclusion is the same, no matter what the regime does the reason is the same. The reason is always the same, to keep a weak, illegitimate regime in power.
So, one year ago, I wrote a monograph explaining in detail the politics and the heritage of this movement called The Ayatollahs and the MEK: Iran’s Crumbling Influence Operation. This was an attempt to show why the MEK is misunderstood, how they championed the legacy as you heard from Madame Rajavi today of Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadeq. But today, many things have changed. The regime leaders, including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, are openly complaining about the effectiveness of the MEK, which has helped to organize protests all across Iran and is tracking the casualties of the coronavirus pandemic. We will know soon which numbers are correct, the regime numbers which are low or the NCRI numbers which are over 70,000 dead. We will know soon who is corrupt.
But in the West, where I am sitting, news reports are saying the same old, false, discredited things about the MEK. Why are they doing this? The resistance has consistently advocated for free elections since the 1979 revolution. Mrs. Rajavi has never failed, from what I have heard, to point out that the NCRI’s goal is to give back sovereignty to the people of Iran, not to seize power themselves. On Friday, just two days ago, Madame Rajavi said, “We the people of Iran and the Iranian resistance will build a free and democratic Iran.” She pledged, “a commitment to remain faithful to our people’s sovereignty and their vote, not seek power at any cost, but to establish freedom and justice at any cost, and never return to the dictatorships of the Shah and the mullahs.” And as the majority of elected lawmakers in the United States and Europe have pointed out, “We want to establish a democratic secular and non-nuclear Iran.”
Is there any other resistance group advocating universal democratic values in Iran? Is there any other resistance group standing for gender equality against a brutal and corrupt regime 100 percent controlled by men? Is there any other resistance group that is capable of organizing a worldwide virtual meeting with thousands of people in over 100 countries? You will recognize that picture. It is a remarkable sight. The world has never seen anything like that. The regime sees these events and they know the NCRI and the MEK more than anyone else are fully capable of organizing a democratic transition to legitimate constitutional government after the fall of the regime.
The group was on terrorism lists around the world. Today, I believe the tables have turned. As we say in America, the shoe is on the other foot. The Iranian diplomat, Assadollah Assadi is facing charges of terrorism in the Belgian court. His plot to bomb the NCRI rally in Villepinte in 2018 involved Iranian Embassies in several countries. How many journalists have asked Foreign Minister Zarif to explain why he’s using diplomatic privileges to support terrorism, while authorities in Denmark, France, Belgium, Germany, Austria, and Albania have all encountered state-sponsored Iranian terror activity on their soil in the past two years? And for those who may not be aware, I have said this many times, no member of the MEK or NCRI has ever been prosecuted and convicted of terrorism in a democratic country with an independent judiciary observing the rule of law.
So now, when I read Western news reports of Friday’s virtual rally and the Twitter criticisms that try to prevent anyone from mentioning the resistance, it is the reporters and the analysts whose motives must now be questioned. Are they on Tehran’s payroll? Are their relatives being threatened (of harm)? Are they agents of the regime following the 80/20.tactic? I am sure you know what the 80/20 tactic is. You should criticize the regime 80 percent of the time but make sure that 20 percent you criticize the NCRI and MEK, so it looks more authentic and credible.
Yes, it is a different world, ladies and gentlemen. I know what the facts are. The NCRI’s critics are trapped in a web of propaganda and falsehoods. As a former American official who deeply believes we need to know the truth about all these matters, I urge you to keep challenging the world media to tell the truth. Because, my friends, the truth about this regime is now available for the whole world to see at Ashraf 3, with the personal testimony of brave survivors and detailed evidence on display. I am confident that the truth will come out and, when it does, the truth will set Iran free.
