Uniting for Freedom, Democracy & Equality​

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
1988 Massacre
Activities
Activities Outside Iran
Annual Grand Gathering
Articles
Coronavirus
Death Commissions
Economic
Free Iran 2020 Global Summit
Free Iran 2021
Free Iran 2022
Free Iran 2023
Free Iran 2024
Free Iran World Summit
Free Iran World Summit 2023
Grand Gathering 2016
Grand Gathering 2017
Grand Gathering 2017- Videos
Grand Gathering 2018
Grand Gathering 2018- Videos
Grand Gathering 2019
Grand Gathering 2020
Human Rights
International Supports
Iran Protests
Iran Revolution
Iranian Assemblies
Iranian Resistance
Maryam Rajavi
Media Gallery
National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI)
News
Opinion
Partial list of speakers & dignitaries at the 2018 Free Iran Gathering
People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran(PMOI/MEK)
Quotes
Reports
Resistance Activities Inside Iran
Socio - Economic Crisis
The Free Iran World Summit 2019
The Free Iran World Summit 2021
Videos
Women

British Committee for Iran Freedom (BCFIF) Statement: Censuring Iran Is Not Enough to Make Up for Flawed Western Strategy on Nuclear Issues

Prof. Lord Alton of Liverpool on behalf of the British Committee for Iran Freedom (BCFIF) on the resolution adopted by the IAEA Board of Governors censuring the regime in Iran issued a statement.

Full text of the statement as follows:
Today (June 9), the IAEA Board of Governors passed a resolution formally censuring the regime in Iran over its persistent non-cooperation with the UN nuclear agency.

Details of Iran’s non-cooperation were contained in a report by the IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi, published last week, emphasising an absence of technically credible reasons for the presence of nuclear material in environmental samples collected from three undeclared sites after implementation of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, or the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)

There is mounting frustration with Iran’s evasiveness, lending additional credence to longstanding criticisms of the JCPoA as having given away too much in exchange for too little. This has effectively allowed the Iranian authorities to sweep its history of military nuclear activities under the carpet. In turn this has underscored the international community’s earlier failure to develop a complete picture of the Iranian nuclear programme after its first clandestine details were revealed to the world in 2002 by the country’s leading opposition group, the People’s Mojahedin Organisation of Iran (PMOI).

The JCPoA represents only one aspect of a Western strategy which has foolishly prioritised negotiations with the regime over all other considerations. By contrast, a well coordinated application of pressure might have exposed Iran’s entire nuclear infrastructure to daylight.

But even in their subordinate role, economic sanctions and diplomatic isolation have proven remarkably effective, and in the years leading up to the JCPoA’s implementation have been broadly credited with forcing Tehran to the negotiating table.

It is a tragedy that implementation entailed the removal of the very pressures that could have otherwise been used to resolve the issue once and for all.

Six UN resolutions on Iran’s nuclear programme were suspended under the seven-party agreement, and they remained suspended even after the U.S. pulled out of the agreement in 2018.

Since then, Tehran has made serious nuclear advances including the enrichment of at least 43 kilograms of uranium to 60% fissile purity and the installation of more advanced centrifuges enabling that material to easily cross the final threshold to weapons grade.

Meanwhile, the regime has suffered no consequences for its escalating provocations, but has imposed increasingly bold, irrelevant demands during the negotiations seeking to restore the JCPoA.

As the UK, France and Germany reiterated in their joint statement to the Board of Governors on 7 June, “None of these activities have credible civilian justification in Iran.”

The resolution by the IAEA Board of Governors is a vital first step in challenging the permissiveness that has for so long defined the international community’s dealings with Iran’s nuclear programme. The present responsibility of the UN agency is to not only make up for flaws in the JCPoA restoration process, but to end Iran’s impunity in this matter.

To that end, the ultimate goal in this week’s meetings should be to set the stage for re-imposing the six resolutions suspended by the JCPoA, and to refer the dossier of Iran’s nuclear provocations back to the UN Security Council so it may lay out a new strategy which pursues a complete understanding of Iran’s nuclear history, and exerts adequate pressure to obtain it.

Professor the Lord Alton of Liverpool
Independent Crossbench Member of the House of Lords
9 June 2022

Recent Posts