{"id":22962,"date":"2021-07-04T17:09:04","date_gmt":"2021-07-04T15:09:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/iranfreedom.org\/en\/?p=22962"},"modified":"2021-07-04T17:09:05","modified_gmt":"2021-07-04T15:09:05","slug":"play-with-the-extension-card-of-the-agreement-with-the-iaea-corded-or-lifeline-for-the-iranian-regime","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/iranfreedom.org\/en\/articles\/2021\/07\/play-with-the-extension-card-of-the-agreement-with-the-iaea-corded-or-lifeline-for-the-iranian-regime\/22962\/","title":{"rendered":"Play With the Extension Card of the Agreement With the IAEA; Corded or Lifeline for the Iranian Regime?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

What is the point of the IAEA negotiations with the Iranian regime and the JCPOA negotiations?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

There has been contradictory news about the recent negotiations between the Iranian regime and world power.\u00a0 Clearly, the Iranian regime is dragging its feet with the negotiations. But what would be the result.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The fate of the seventh round of Vienna talks is in limbo after the end of a month-long agreement and the insistence of Rafael Grossi, director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA<\/a>), and some Western countries on reforming the deal and not accepting the regime\u2019s demand of returning to the same deal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Remarks on the side of the Iranian regime<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

On the Iranian side, all remarks confirm the escalation of the conflict <\/a>with the IAEA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe will no longer return the videos recorded at the nuclear facility to the IAEA,\u201d said Qalibaf, the speaker of the regime\u2019s parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Sunday, June 27, 2021, he added about the extension of the agreement: \u201cNothing has been extended, and none of the items recorded inside will ever be given to the Agency.\u201d However, he did not talk about deleting them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Khatibzadeh, a spokesman for Iran\u2019s foreign ministry, said in a statement on Monday: \u201cWe have not made a decision on whether to clear the agency\u2019s camera data.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meshkini, a spokesman for the parliament\u2019s National Security Commission, said: \u201cIran\u2019s red line in the UN Security Council is to lift all sanctions and ensure that they are lifted. \u00bb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He added: \u201cThe resistance of the West, especially the United States, to not guarantee the fulfillment of its obligations is questionable. The United States wants to maintain some of the sanctions at all costs, which shows that they are seeking to use the trigger mechanism.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIran has no obligation beyond safeguards to the International Atomic Energy Agency, and Mr. Grossi\u2019s idea of \u200b\u200bextending the three-month agreement between Iran and the IAEA is a misconception,\u201d said Amoie, a member of the regime\u2019s parliament security commission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Finally, the government\u2019s spokesman Ali Rabiee announced on June 28 that the Iranian regime had not yet decided on the Vienna talks and that the continuation of the negotiations might be postponed to the next government.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cOnce we extended the agreement, but this extension should not lead to erosive negotiations,\u201d he added. \u201cThe other side must live up to its obligations, and Iran\u2019s relationship with the IAEA will be based on safeguards if the agreement is not implemented.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

With these statements already made, it seems that the mullahs\u2019 regime is abusing the discussion of extending the agreement with the Atomic Energy Agency as a means of bargaining in the nuclear talks<\/a> in Vienna along with the lifting of further US sanctions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The West must be aware of such abuses by the International Atomic Energy Agency and IAEA technical oversight of the Iranian regime\u2019s nuclear program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n