Uniting for Freedom, Democracy & Equality​

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
1988 Massacre
Activities
Activities Outside Iran
Annual Grand Gathering
Articles
Coronavirus
Death Commissions
Economic
Free Iran 2020 Global Summit
Free Iran 2021
Free Iran 2022
Free Iran 2023
Free Iran 2024
Free Iran World Summit
Free Iran World Summit 2023
Grand Gathering 2016
Grand Gathering 2017
Grand Gathering 2017- Videos
Grand Gathering 2018
Grand Gathering 2018- Videos
Grand Gathering 2019
Grand Gathering 2020
Human Rights
International Supports
Iran Protests
Iran Revolution
Iranian Assemblies
Iranian Resistance
Maryam Rajavi
Media Gallery
National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI)
News
Opinion
Partial list of speakers & dignitaries at the 2018 Free Iran Gathering
People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran(PMOI/MEK)
Quotes
Reports
Resistance Activities Inside Iran
Socio - Economic Crisis
The Free Iran World Summit 2019
The Free Iran World Summit 2021
Videos
Women

Iranian diplomat &its surrender to Belgium is through the mechanism of EU, Eric David says

Eric David: Iranian diplomat and its surrender to Belgium is through the mechanism of EU

I’m going to make a speech. That is the bad news. The good news, I’ll be short!

In fact, of course I’m going to speak just from a legal point of view, but I shouldn’t be too technical, as you can see.

What I would like to say is, the fact that they arrest the Iranian diplomat and its surrender to Belgium through the mechanism of European arrest warrant, as provided floor by the 2002 framework decision of the European Union, this arrest and the surrender is not extradition. Because extradition is procedure from state to state, through the executive branch of states. And here we do not speak about extradition but about surrender, it’s something which is quite different.

Interestingly, the German judicial authorities perfectly dismissed the objections, which was founded on the diplomatic immunity of the so-called diplomatic immunity of the presumed offender, in fact, this Iranian diplomat.

According to the 1961 convention, on the diplomatic relationship, the jurisdiction authority of diplomats applies only in the country where the foreign diplomat is accredited and in the countries classed by the diplomat to go from the sending state to the visiting state, and it is all return to the sending States. As a member of this special mission, it’s also an example where the diplomats’ immunity can play some rule. But it was not the case here. The Iranian diplomat who was arrested was not in none of these pertinent. Furthermore, what is interesting, for the first time a state terrorism is at stake on the judicial level. That’s really important.

With this extraordinary legal consequence is the fact that the Iranian Government could be descried for the proceedings in the future decision which will be taken by the judiciary Belgian authorities, the Iranian government could be described as a terrorist government. That’s something which is really new from a legal point of view.

As such this surrender remains a real victory. The victory on the one hand, as had been said, of the Belgian security services which succeeded to detect and thwarted foiled and abstract and that attempted state-sponsored terrorist attack and on the other hand, this surrender is also a victory of the rule of law.

Thank you for your attention.

Recent Posts